Red_State_Blue
Reflections on a House Divided
Celebrate Disaster
It's about CHANGE
Christopher Landon: Ice Cold in Alex
Interesting and well developed characters, in genuinely tension inducing situations - even when the matter of "who did it" is not really a mystery. Vivid enough for the place and period - WW2 North Africa to early 1950s Britain - to come to life inside your mind. (***)
Karl Von Clausewitz: On War
I read this first many years ago.
The author then impressed me as being more lucid and broadly learned than many contemporary writers on this and similar areas. He still does. (****)
Loren Lomasky: Person's, Rights, and the Moral Community
Well written, and clear. Many interesting ideas and explications of problems, but his theory itself - on a derivation of rights, seems possessed of unnecessary elements. Worth reading. (***)
J.G.Ballard: The Drowned World
Another (long-time) re-read.
Ballard tends to play one note - but it's a good one - and he plays it VERY well. Some uncontrolled/unforeseen calamity engulfs the world. Protagonist(s) confront general realization of the coldly impersonal nature of the world and how human responses are to a large extent a product of the interaction of those forces with his/there-own biological pre-dispositions - engraved in the structure of each and every one of their cells. And, that the true and only expression of one's authentic self and humanity, lies in how and whether one can/does inwardly accept the truth of these constraints, and expresses that realization, in those (few) opportunities available for actual personal choice.
Intentionally or not his work gives powerful and poetic expression to the Existentialist perspective.
The world of this novel happens to be slowly drowning in the over-heated flood-tides that result from a run-away solar anomaly. But, it could be just about any such occurrence - e.g. A "Wind From Nowhere," or the Japanese invasion of Shanghai (both of which served as the backgrounds of others among his novels). The story-line, character-types, dilemmas, decisions, and general moods are much the same in each story, but the pacing, poetry, intensity, and aggravating authenticity of the characterizations in each instance are gripping enough to make every reading worthwhile. (***)
« On Purpose | Main | Who They Are »
The comments to this entry are closed.
CELEBRATE DISASTER and ON PURPOSE are, I think, your best essays to this point, so well structured, thorough, and absolutely clear--bravo for that!
Here are a few of my post-read thoughts:
1. A large number of people in our country don't fit what I think you consider to be the "liberal elite," still embrace and are concerned about many of the values you believe are in danger of eroding, don't dream of socialism or communism, have high ethical standards, obey the laws, and love their pets, yet find some positions of the Right incompatible with their own deeply-felt values. They are not "anti-American," as Michelle Bachmann insultingly asserts. They they recognize the ridiculous extremes in the media on both sides,and don't identify with either. They aren't deluded, idiots, or tools of the radical Left. They're longing for
candidates who can speak to their needs, who understand the world doesn't work without compromise,
don't think a compromise is automatically synonymous with personal or political failure, and don't look at every unsuccessful outcome as something to be blamed on the "other side" when mistakes and lack of foresight know no party.
2. I don't believe the logic of your assumptions is faulty, just
that there are many more variables and perspectives operating that could result, still applying impeccable logic, in a different outcome than you describe.
But getting one's concerns and the possible results of actions taken or not taken out there (which you
always do!) is what's most important. Essay on, David.
Posted by: mauve1 | 22 October 2008 at 16:56